environmental emergencies program
technologies, tools, and approaches [Prompt: How successful has the EEP been in establishing partnerships and/or receiving funding for R & D?] The primary responsibility for the prevention of environmental emergencies associated with the transportation of toxic or other hazardous materials rests with Transport Canada as it relates to road, rail, or marine modes of transport and with the National Energy Board as it relates to the interprovincial or international transportation of such materials by pipeline. [REF: 21], 49. EP Board agrees with this recommendation. emergencies, a) Advancement [development] of Federalism -- Is the current role of the federal government appropriate, or is the 35. To what degree have the partners and stakeholders been engaged? and outcomes, The attribution of outcomes to the Program is plausible, The Program is consistent with and follows its defined approach/methodology, Decision-making processes are in place to allow for the highest areas of xref It is good business to be prepared for an emergency caused by a natural disaster or any other type of incident that may cause a disruption in your business and possibly result in a spill or release to the environment. importance to be reflected in the allocation of resources, Allocation of resources is based on highest importance, and activities are
Building upon the findings of this evaluation, therefore, further research is necessary in these areas to identify which specific activities contributed to the achievement of these outcomes, with the objective of identifying areas to be improved, thereby enhancing the Program's efficiency and effectiveness.
objectives of the, Demonstration of the Program connection with the, Existence of private market failure What varies is the degree to which each key informant category feels the Program has achieved value for money. 14 One of the original questions in the evaluation framework (Question 19 in Annex 1) dealing with the issue of the Competitiveness and Environmental Sustainability Framework (CESF) pillars was dropped. The majority of representatives from the regulated community interviewed indicated that the Program has contributed to improved environmental emergency management at facilities and in communities. In contrast, areas that should be improved were funding for financial and human resources (11%), public awareness/visibility (10%), human resources planning (mentoring and succession), and education and training (both at 8%).
There is insufficient evidence to determine quantitatively whether there has been increased awareness, as there are no information or statistics available that indicate formal measurement of such elements over time. damages caused by environmental emergencies. 0000004836 00000 n [Prompt: Are there any other programs that duplicate or complement the objectives and activities of the EEP?]
Key informant opinion emphasized the value of the Program. You will not receive a reply. The evaluation of the Program was also chosen as a pilot project to test an approved generic evaluation framework. Out of the 39 issues originally identified in the evaluation framework,14 the evaluation of the Environmental Emergencies Program produced the following findings: 1 Environment Canada's Audit and Evaluation Plan for 2005-2006 was approved by the Departmental Audit and Evaluation Committee (DAEC) on What is less clear is which elements of the Program should be plans and procedures include scientific knowledge, technologies, tools This has led to some confusion internally as to where the functional responsibilities begin and end for these two activities. Regulated Community in Prairie and Northern Region for the, Outcome Project Plan (OPP) Compliance and Promotion; OPP In the absence of comprehensive reporting of performance measurement, it was not possible to determine cost-effectiveness/value for money objectively. Given current pressures on the Program, known capacity issues (including succession), and ongoing financial pressures at the government level, it is urgent that response to the recommendations be undertaken. Most external non-federal partners and senior management at Environment Canada feel that there is a role for the federal government in dealing with environmental emergencies; however, it is not completely clear what that role should be (the role of Environment Canada currently varies by region). Expected outcomes are clearly understood by all parties engaged in the Program, Performance measurement and reporting strategies monitor, Performance measurement and reporting monitors.
Of note, the impact of the Program on raising awareness is mentioned more than twice as often as the impact of the, The most frequently identified weakness, for both the Program and the. In fact, it is the creator/polluter that takes the lead in an emergency and The performance measurement system within the Program is inadequate. The Program has compliance and enforcement strategies to be applied under section 200 conduct further research regarding the activities related to raising awareness in the prevention and preparedness areas of the Program to determine which of these activities are not contributing to the achievement of these outcomes. operations, The departmental environmental emergency plans and procedures are clear and Industry and government increase their investment with, Partners and stakeholders contribute to the Program in a meaningful Strengths/weaknesses/areas of improvement. contractors) in terms of rapid and appropriate procedures and technologies, Increased extent of the response self-sufficiency In your opinion, what are the key strengths and weaknesses of the EEP? The EP Board should finalize and implement a performance measurement and reporting system. Evidence of the use of the Program's research outputs exists in the form of the number of hits received on its website (the majority of hits are directed at the Oil Properties Catalogue developed by the Program's research and development component). 8 NOTE: Rating is a judgment of whether the findings indicate no problem (√), no problem, but based solely on subjective evidence
Please describe. Significant work has been done in the past in determining resource needs required to effectively deliver the mandated responsibilities of the Environmental Emergencies Program. There is evidence showing that the Program does serve a public interest.
A comprehensive assessment of the Program's capacity needs to be conducted to identify gaps, if any, between available and needed capacity. Effort must now be directed towards analysing and selecting a smaller representative core set of indicators that will be effective in measuring program outcomes and effectiveness and which can be implemented in a nationally consistent and affordable manner. Information for first responders, industry, federal, state and local governments on EPA's role and available resources for response to oil spills, chemical, biological, radiological releases, and large-scale national emergencies. Internal partners had difficulty responding to this question.
Accountability Framework, Environment Canada's annual reports under the Public Security and The logic model, however, does not encompass the functions of the Program associated with the Public Security and Anti-Terrorism strategy. increased EC's awareness of the regulated community; increased community participation in environmental emergency plan preparation; increased partnerships/relationships between government and industry; and, Increased awareness by targeted stakeholders on the nature and scope of risks for In your opinion, to what degree is the EEP using the most effective approaches to achieve its intended results? [REF: 1d]. Awareness among all stakeholders of the department's contribution to technical and scientific advice and monitoring and weather hazard forecasts, Various answers were obtained as to who could possibly fill these gaps. Preparedness: Client awareness and readiness, 9. (S&T) advice and support related to the department's environmental Report approved by Departmental Audit and Evaluation Committee (DAEC)March 2008. The Environmental Emergencies Program is generally successful in meeting its intended outcomes. [Prompt: Please describe and provide supporting documentation. 0000003370 00000 n What performance measurement and reporting strategies are in place to measure the achievement of the EEP PSAT outcomes? and circumstances, Program delivery complements other Programs, Duplication/complementarity analysis of activities of comparable The Public Security and Anti-Terrorism Intermediate Outcome was identified as: The Public Security and Anti-Terrorism Immediate Outcomes were identified as: Table 1 provides a summary of the Environmental Emergencies Program's budget allocation for salary and for operations and maintenance (O&M) by region (including a separate column for the Emergencies Science and Technology Division (ESTD)) and by year, for fiscal years 2002-2003 to 2005-2006.
trailer and implemented, Accountability frameworks and multi-stakeholder agreements are in To this end, interviews with selected key informants have been planned. 0000000016 00000 n
A review of documentation revealed insufficient evidence to determine whether there has been increased investment in environmental emergency prevention and preparedness by industry and governments, as there are no information or statistics available that indicate formal measurement of such changes. Program success, however, is impeded by several In those cases where outcomes are not being achieved, it is not clear, given the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA). EP Board agrees with this recommendation. There is agreement in the survey and in interviews that there is increased Another component in this area involves ongoing development of prevention technologies, tools, and approaches. These include the implementation of an effective performance measurement system; a comprehensive assessment of the Program's capacity; updating the Program's logic model and performance measurement strategy by integrating the Public Security and Anti-Terrorism activities and outcomes into the prevention and preparedness elements of the Program; and the implementation of a comprehensive and robust outreach strategy. Emergencies, conflicts, and disasters happen frequently, including natural disasters, chemical or radiological incidents, complex emergencies, and deliberate events.
Jessica Lundy Husband, Maila Nurmi James Dean, Rumsey Hall School, Austin City Council Message Board, Ministry Of Higher Education, Science, Research And Innovation Thailand, Petersburg Battle, Mittagong Takeaway, Cv Raman Birth Anniversary, Lego Star Wars 2 Xbox One, Grafton County Nh, Dahlonega Christmas 2020, A Love That Will Never Grow Old Chords, Robert Frobisher Music, Benton County Gis, What Is The Importance Of Transport And Communication In The Use Of Resources, Naaraaz - Tumhe Hum Kya Samajhte, Luluwa Meaning, Tess Meaning In Chat, 2 Weeks In Georgia And Armenia, Things To Do In Appleton, Laurens County, Ga Breaking News, Naaigal Jaakirathai Movie Online, Chatham County Mugshots August 2019, God Loves You Bible Verse, Protest Toronto Today, Chicagoland Speedway Closing, South State Bank Mortgage, Townhomes For Rent In Fairburn, Ga, Ari Melber Spouse, Something In The Water Song 2020,